culture, politics, commentary, criticism

Tuesday, September 16, 2003
CalPundit aka Kevin Drum provides an excellent, exclusive interview with
Paul Krugman, who recently published an outstanding article entitled "The Tax-Cut Con" in the New York Times Magazine.
The Texas goose step. Adventures in procedural fascism continue in the Texas redistricting crisis. Story from the
Houston Chronicle:
A Democratic crowd in the gallery pelted the Republican leadership with jeers of "Nazis" as the Senate adjourned quickly to deny boycotting senators a chance to re-enter the Senate triumphantly while it was in session.


The other 10 boycotting Democrats walked into the Senate chamber at 12:07 p.m. A ring of television cameras and boom microphones surrounded them. The gallery crowd cheered wildly.

"Thank you, Texas!" Sen. Leticia Van de Putte, D-San Antonio, shouted back to the crowd.

Van de Putte, chairwoman of the Senate Democratic Caucus, said the boycott was about more than partisan politics. She said the Democrats wanted to make certain the Republicans did not stifle the voices of rural Texans and minorities with redistricting plans harmful to their interests.

Sen. Mario Gallegos made fun of the Republicans for adjourning so quickly.

"If they were so eager for us to come back to work, where are they?" said Gallegos, D-Houston. "If they were so eager for us to make a quorum and make the issues on the floor, where are they?"
At the center of the storm is Republican Texas Speaker Tom Craddick who, with Tom DeLay, was a conspirator in the craven illegal abuse of the federal Department of Homeland Security just to shore up Craddick's petty fiefdom in Midland, West Texas.
Monday, September 15, 2003
L. Jean Lewis and the two faces of scandal. "The really germane question is this: How exactly did L. Jean Lewis rise suddenly from the ranks of minor RTC [Resolution Trust Corp.] investigator to the overseer of a massive Defense Department bureau [that investigates fraud and audits Pentagon contracts, including the billions of dollars being awarded in Iraq to companies like Halliburton and Bechtel]? What exactly were her qualifications? The ones she put on display for the RTC: Namely, ginning up scandals against Democrats, and covering up scandals against Republicans."

That's David Neiwert at
Orcinus (see also here). Via Atrios posts here and here.
Friday, September 12, 2003
Darleen Druyun, enemy combatant
in the war against US taxpayers

Darleen's $5.7 billion surprise. Darleen Druyun, an Air Force acquisitions officer, apparently notified Boeing that a competitor had underbid them by several billion dollars.

She's no longer with the Air Force. Guess where she works now...
[Forbes/Reuters:] Boeing Co. rejected published reports on Friday that it might have obtained rival bidder Airbus SAS's proprietary information en route to a proposed $22.5 billion refueling tanker lease-purchase agreement with the U.S. Air Force.

Darleen Druyun, hired by Boeing after leaving her job as a top Air Force acquisition official last year, told the Chicago-based company "several times" that Airbus's price was $5 million to $17 million less than Boeing's, an internal Boeing e-mail published on Friday said.


The lease of 100 tankers based on the Boeing 767 would cost as much as $5.7 billion more than an outright purchase, the U.S. Congressional Budget Office said in an Aug. 26 report.
This is the issue recently alluded to by Paul Krugman as evidence of the American press missing or barely covering important stories (via Arms and the Man).

⇒ This post was updated on November 24, 2003.
The profitable War on Terror. We know where more than $2 billion of that $87 billion interim price tag is going (
Wall Street Journal, sub. req'd):
HOUSTON -- Halliburton Corp.'s (HAL) U.S. government contracts to restore Iraqi oil production and provide support services to troops will cost taxpayers an estimated $2 billion and are expected to rise further, Army spokesmen said Wednesday.

An Army Corps of Engineers contract to rehabilitate the country's oil fields is now valued at $948 million, more than $200 million above the level projected last month. Halliburton's Army Field Support Command contract is now estimated to cost $1 billion in Iraq alone, up more than $400 million from the level in late May.

Although only a small fraction of the value of the contracts will end up as Halliburton profits, the higher price tag could pose political challenges for the Bush administration because Vice President Dick Cheney was previously the company's chief executive.

As with the cost of the overall U.S. effort in Iraq, the Halliburton contracts have escalated in value as Iraqi infrastructure continues to be plagued by looting and sabotage.


Halliburton reported $292 million in Iraq-related revenues for the quarter ended June 30. Analysts said the Iraq work added two or three cents per share. Halliburton reported second-quarter net income of $26 million, or 6 cents a share, compared with a net loss of $498 million, or $1.15 a share, in the same period the year before.

A Halliburton spokeswoman said the company wouldn't comment on the future earnings impact of its Iraq-related work.
What a difference an invasion makes: a net loss of $498 million versus a quarterly profit of $26 million. That's over a half billion dollar swing to the plus side for Halliburton in a single quarter, comparing 2003 to 2002. And it's in the exact opposite direction of the swing our federal budget has taken from the plus to the minus column. Coincidence, or chicanery?

Did you catch that other detail? Looting and sabotage increase the value of the Halliburton contracts.

Now we know why there's so much chaos in Iraq since the invasion — it's so fucking profitable.
Thursday, September 11, 2003
110 Stories

A poem by John M. Ford

Via Making Light
Wednesday, September 10, 2003
"California receives less than $5 per person in first responder grants, while Wyoming receives more than $35." This column by Christopher Cox, California Republican, who is chairman of the U.S. House of Representatives' Select Committee on Homeland Security, was published in the Washington Times. Via
The September 11, 2001, attacks drew immediate attention to the key role of our "first responders" -- the police, firefighters and emergency medical teams who are the first on any crisis scene.

Subsequently, the nation's attention has also focused on the deficiencies in information sharing within our federal government, notably the FBI, CIA and other intelligence community agencies.

These two crucial elements of homeland security are inextricably linked, because information about an attack that reaches the front lines of local authorities could potentially reduce its impact if not stop it entirely.

In the two years since the September 11 attacks, the focus on first responders has increased awareness that federal money isn't reaching them where it is needed. But while much of the discussion has focused simplistically on calls for ever-higher spending, an even greater problem is that information gathered by counterterrorism experts at significant taxpayer expense is ignored in the disbursement process.


All sides agree this takes money. And Congress has responded. Since that terrible day in September two years ago, Congress has spent more than $20 billion on first responders -- an increase of more than 1,000 percent. Even for Washington, this is an incredible amount of money.

But the involvement of such large sums only accentuates the importance of spending wisely. That means all funds should be disbursed on the basis of hard-nosed threat assessment. However, current federal funding for first responders is parceled out among the states with a guaranteed minimum for every state (presumably, because every state has two senators). One obvious distortion is that California receives less than $5 per person in first responder grants, while Wyoming receives more than $35. The same result obtains in other large states, including New York.
Dick Cheney's home state is financially buffered against the threat of terrorists, while California and New York are left dangling in the wind.

Wyoming is to states as Halliburton is to corporations.

There seems to be a pattern here.
Tuesday, September 09, 2003
Department of Redundancy Department.

Monthly premiums for employer-sponsored health care in the United States jumped by 13.9 percent between spring 2002 and 2003.


Nearly every publicly traded HMO posted record profits in recent quarters.

Correct answer: 7) All of the above. We have William F. Buckley to thank for this concise summary (
The inquiry continues: Why the [hateful] feelings toward Bush? The answer, as agreed upon in this improvised study, was: 1) He is not legitimately president of the United States. The other guy got more votes. Bush slipped in because of capricious conduct by the courts. 2) Bush is a Christer. He takes every opportunity to inform the American people that he is in touch with the Lord and therefore that, by deduction, what he does is the Lord's work. 3) He gravely miscalculated the onus of what he set out to do in Iraq. The consequences of that miscalculation are deaths unending, and more money spent than King Solomon dreamed of. 4) The economy lacks the kind of resiliency it might have shown if more resourcefully tended. 5) His truckling to the rich in his tax cuts shows a callous disregard of civil adjudications between America's poor and America's rich. And finally, 6) He is a liar. He specifically informed the public that Iraq had in hand instantly deployable weapons of mass destruction. These, it proved, did not exist.
I especially like the passive, tortured double-conditional construction of #4.
"People in the wider world don't care." Lies, facts — it's all the same to the propaganda machine supporting Jessica Lynch, Caucasian poster girl for the fraudulence behind the invasion of Iraq by the US (
Moby Lives, see 8 September 2003):
Knopf announced last Tuesday that it had signed a book deal with recently discharged Private Jessica Lynch concerning her rescue from an Iraqi medical facility, with the book to be written by recently discharged New York Times writer Rick Bragg. A Publishers Weekly report by Charlotte Abbott says, "Called I'm a Soldier Too: The Jessica Lynch Story and set for publication on Veteran's Day, November 11, it has become one of the fall's most anticipated books almost overnight." But as Abbott points out, the publisher will also have to deal with "lingering questions" about Lynch's rescue — subsequent reports showed she was under little threat and her wounds were perhaps exaggerated — and "Bragg's reputation in the wake of his resignation from the Times on May 28" for having filed reports lifted largely from the work of an assistant. Says Knopf publicity v.p. Paul Bogaards, "People in the wider world don't care."
Regarding Bragg's recent troubles: "In bylining a story that he did not witness, and writing vivid descriptions of things he did not see, Bragg comes perilously close to the techniques of Jayson Blair," says Jack Shafer in Slate.

Rick Bragg couldn't write the "vivid descriptions of things he did not see" in Showtime's "DC 9/11" because that job was already taken, not because the things he purports to describe existed.

What propagandists who call themselves journalists write cannot even disparagingly be called "fiction" — it's just deception, pure and simple. But, as we're constantly reminded, "People in the wider world don't care."

For her role in the charade, Jessica Lynch will receive 100% of all book royalties and split the $1 million advance with Bragg, who receives the sole author credit. Ka-ching!

And now please join me in a silent prayer for Leni Riefenstahl.
Monday, September 08, 2003
A brief hiatus. Back soon.
Thursday, September 04, 2003
Big ol' grab bag o' links. Here are just a few of the hundreds of things I've been meaning to share with you:
David Neiwert, the go-to guy for tracking the rise of American fascism, has published his entire "Rush, Newspeak and Fascism" mega-essay. You can download it whole as a pdf on his site Orcinus, or you can read it in chapters on the indispensable Cursor.

BP Solar provides this calculator for determining how much you'd pay/save if you were install a solar power system to generate electricity for your home. It supposedly works by zip code, figuring your area's capacity for sunlight into the mix.

Free books in pdf format for the asking.

Acres of newspapers — 273 front pages from 37 countries presented alphabetically, courtesy of Newseum. Refreshed daily.

Via Cryptome, a civil action: The Estate of John O'Neill v. The Republic of Iraq. John P. O'Neill, Sr. was a former top FBI counter-terrorism official who had become director of security for the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey shortly before September 11, 2001. He died in the World Trade Center. We've written about him before.

Brian Montopoli looks at the 9/11 investigation, or lack thereof, in Washington Monthly. Montopoli also has a blog of his own.
Visit one and all.
Wednesday, September 03, 2003
Paul Hill: Anti-child activist. One of the most remarkable things about the homicidal zealotry of some so-called "pro-life" activists is their hatred of children. Paul Hill, the abortion doctor killer who is actively looking forward to his execution scheduled for later today, is
the father of three children (Fox News).

His willingness to orphan his own sacred progeny reveals an irrational derangement that destroys whatever message his actions were supposed to impart to those of us who disagree with him.

But his message is nevertheless clear: he wants all women not to have dominion over their own bodies, and he wants his own children not to have a father.
Tuesday, September 02, 2003
To a Bush, all facts are useless. Reality deprivation runs in the Bush family, including the president's brother, dyslexic adulterer and Saudi PR adviser Neil Bush (
USA Today):
The problem with education, says Neil Bush, is that we create prison-like environments that suppress many students' natural gifts and bore them with useless facts.

The president's brother is speaking on a panel at Whitney High, a Southern California academic powerhouse, where his company's social studies software is being tested by eighth-graders. But Bush quickly finds himself alone, pitted against several bright-as-lights Whitney students who like calculus. They think the problem isn't that school is boring, but that educators, parents and kids set their expectations too low.

"I hear students say, 'Oh, math is boring, or that subject is boring, so I don't want to do it.' I say, that's an excuse, a crutch. A student should want to learn everything. That's what we're here for," notes one.
Fortunately, today's crutch-free eighth-graders — the ones who appreciate the finer things in life, like calculus, or anything factual — will be writing the educational software of the future.

In the meanwhile, California kids will be hobbled by the software equivalent of Billy Beer.
Friday, August 29, 2003
Celebrate Owners Day Weekend with the GOP. I received this email:
Dear Skimble,

As we celebrate with our friends and family this [Labor Day] weekend, let us be thankful for the small business owners throughout the country who are the engine of our economy.[1] With over 22.9 million small businesses across the country, they provide approximately 75 percent of the net new jobs added to the economy.[2] The President understands that when small business owners can keep more of their money, they are going to reinvest it in their businesses.[3] With the ability to update or expand, small-business owners will hire more employees, give raises to the employees they have, buy new equipment or invest in advertising.[4] The hard work of small business owners and their entrepreneurial vision creates jobs and helps to stimulate our economy.[5]

In celebration of their vision and our shared Republican ideals, let's renew our commitment to America[6] this weekend.[7]



Ed Gillespie
Republican National Committee
Our annotation:
[1] Small business is certainly not the engine of the Bush campaigns, which depend on the generosity of — and expected reciprocal generosity in favor of — big, not small, businesses.

[2] Bush has the worst job creation record since
Herbert Hoover's Great Depression era administration.

[3] I can speak to this one from personal experience as a small business owner. Any extra money scraped together will be allocated to skyrocketing medical insurance premiums, thanks to the total lack of a sensible medical care policy for American citizens — another GOP failure.

[4] Hire? Raises? Equipment? Advertising? I don't think so. See #3. Also, advertising is increasingly only for insiders, thanks to a media cabal controlled by a handful of boards of directors.

[5] Recent economic stimulus has been attributable to dramatic increases in defense spending, hardly the normal playing field for small businesses, except possibly one of Halliburton's Canadian suppliers called HEAT.

[6] It will be difficult for Republicans to renew their patriotic commitment to the sacrifices made by the Small Businesses of America since the party has outsourced its fundraising telemarketing efforts not to Indiana, but to India.

[7] None of this letter (including the edited portion) is about laborers — the point of Labor Day, which originally commemorated the effort, opposed by big business owners, to limit employment to the 8-hour work day at a time when 12 or 16 hours of work per day was the norm. For the party of ownership and big business, "shared Republican ideals" naturally refer to employers' opposition to the 8-hour work day — the celebration of a holiday weekend in an alternate GOP universe: an anti-Labor Day.
We're getting so used to the Republican party meaning the exact opposite of what it says that no one is even fazed any more. The propaganda is so chock full of nonsequiturs that criticism has nowhere to begin its work. What comes out of the mouths of leadership is uniformly expected to be utter self-serving nonsense.

In other words, America under Bush II has become the Soviet Union.

Happy Labor Day.

UPDATE: Looks like Matt Singer at Not Geniuses got the same letter.
"A Big Mac, freedom fries, and $23 billion worth of secret sauce." The Pentagon has placed its order — they're just not going to tell anyone
what it is (Washington Post):
"Black," or classified, programs requested in President Bush's 2004 defense budget are at the highest level since 1988, according to a report prepared by the independent Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments.

The center concluded that classified spending next fiscal year will reach about $23.2 billion of the Pentagon's total request for procurement and research funding. When adjusted for inflation, that is the largest dollar figure since the peak reached during President Ronald Reagan's defense buildup 16 years ago. The amount in 1988 was $19.7 billion, or $26.7 billion if adjusted for inflation, according to the center.

"It's puzzling. It sets the mind to wondering where the money's going and what sort of politically controversial things the administration is doing because they're not telling anybody," said John E. Pike, director of, a research group in Alexandria that has been critical of the administration's defense priorities.


...[Pike] said it is a good bet that some of [the classified money] is going to programs that the administration is known to strongly favor, such as missile defense and the development of hypersonic planes that can fly beyond Earth's atmosphere.

"This is an administration that likes to play I've got a secret," he said. "The growth of the classified budget appears to be part of a larger pattern of this administration being secretive."
There's that old discredited but never-say-die 1980s standby, missile defense. Further proof that Dubya's real father is Ronald Reagan.
Thursday, August 28, 2003
Only the crony survives. Bechtel is reaping the rewards of its insider track, the natural outcome of
yet another Bush administration lie (Wall Street Journal, sub. req'd):
August 28, 2003 8:52 a.m.

Faced with escalating costs and continued instability in Iraq, U.S. officials in Baghdad have decided to boost Bechtel Group Inc.'s postwar reconstruction contract by $350 million, or more than 50%.

The decision to steer additional funds to Bechtel is the latest sign that the Bush administration has seriously underestimated the cost and complexity of rebuilding Iraq. Although the U.S. plans a dramatic push for new reconstruction funds -- part of what one U.S. official said will be a $2.75 billion emergency budget request for Iraq next month -- the administration remains vague on what the overall project is likely to cost.

The new Bechtel money, which could be turned over within days, is part of at least $1 billion the U.S. hopes to pour into Iraqi power generation alone over the next year. U.S. officials and Bechtel assessment teams now estimate Iraqi reconstruction will cost at least $16 billion and likely much more. L. Paul Bremer, the top U.S. official in Iraq, has said that the costs of rebuilding Iraq and revitalizing its economy could top $100 billion.

San Francisco-based Bechtel was originally awarded an 18 month, $680 million contract for Iraqi reconstruction work on airports, water, power, schools, roads and government buildings. After business rivals and some legislators criticized the limited competition involved in that award, Andrew Natsios, the head of the U.S. Agency for International Development, promised that no additional taxpayer money would go into the Bechtel contract beyond the $680 million ceiling.

According to a funding document from the U.S.-led Iraqi provisional authority, however, U.S. officials recently decided that Bechtel requires the additional $350 million "to maintain momentum in high-priority infrastructure projects." Mr. Bremer approved the new projects on Aug. 20, according to the document.

Wednesday, an AID spokeswoman said that "security conditions" had evidently led Mr. Bremer to lift the limit and give more work to Bechtel. The additional $350 million will come from what's left of a $2.5 billion Iraq reconstruction fund Congress approved early this year.
All Bush administration promises are broken because all Bush administration promises are, essentially, lies.

US taxpayers will pay for Bechtel's reconstruction of Iraq's power grid, because the Bush administration insisted on the urgency of invading a country without WMDs. But US consumers will pay for the reconstruction of America's post-blackout power grid.

Since the US tax base is increasingly made up of the lower and middle classes, thanks to Bush administration tax relief for the most wealthy, working Americans will first pay Bechtel and Halliburton to rebuild Iraq and further enrich the Dick Cheneys and Riley Bechtels who have built a rhetoric-rich neocon smokescreen for their crass robber baron capitalism. Then, once taxes have paid for Republican enrichment, what remains of the lower classes' after-tax dollars will go toward higher utility prices to rebuild the American power grid for negligent power providers like FirstEnergy, the likely source of the blackout, a company led by a Bush Pioneer who had raised several hundred thousand dollars for his 2000 presidential campaign.

Billionaire Riley Bechtel, like Cheney's employer Halliburton and a phalanx of shadowy cronies, is using his insider status within the Bush administration to place personal profit above the national interest.

$100 billion, the latest underestimate, is an extraordinary price to pay for imaginary Iraqi weapons. The lies of the Bush administration may be among the most profitable the world has ever seen, and among the most needlessly expensive that taxpayers will ever bear.
Wednesday, August 27, 2003
Enron's secrets are safe with this Republican judge. The Houston Chronicle has led the charge to open up the testimony of former Enron CFO Andrew Fastow, possibly the single most important witness in the case (yet to be made) against former CEO, insider thief, and Bush über-contributor Ken "Kenny Boy" Lay.

But Judge Kenneth Hoyt is not feeling very generous with what is ordinarily
public information:
A federal judge today held two more closed hearings in the criminal case against Andrew Fastow and two other former Enron executives, and refused to unseal the transcript of a July 28 hearing he also held in secret.

U.S. District Judge Kenneth Hoyt denied a motion by the Houston Chronicle to make public the record of the unusual closed hearings in July and the two on today. One conference was held in the morning with prosecutors and the lawyers for defendant Ben Glisan and a second in the afternoon with prosecutors and lawyers for Fastow, Glisan and Daniel Boyle.

All have pleaded not guilty to charges of fraud in connection with various deals at Enron. Fastow faces nearly 100 counts himself.

Hoyt denied a Chronicle request to be allowed to attend the two Tuesday hearings. The Chronicle's reporter and lawyer were told to leave the hallway outside by court security officers, who said Hoyt ordered them to do so. The officers said the two would be detained if they did not leave.

"There are matters that do not need to be discussed in public in ways that embarrasses or humiliates the government or the defense and particularly the court," Hoyt said from the bench.

The judge made clear that the defendants' lawyers had not asked for the multi-defendant closed hearings but that he had closed them himself. Hoyt said sessions with lawyers in a judge's chambers are common and his goal is a fair trial for the defendants and for the government.

He said some matters should not be public. He said it would be impossible to discuss publically such as questions about how much evidence has been obtained, when more evidence might be available or what the two sides recommend for a case schedule.

In other Enron cases and in most criminal cases such questions are routinely asked in open court.
Hoyt was appointed by George W. Bush's real father, Ronald Reagan.

UPDATE: It only gets worse: Hours later, the Chronicle reports "Chronicle shut out of 2 more hearings":
"Embarrassment is not an exception to the First Amendment," Chronicle Editor Jeff Cohen said. "With all due respect to the judge, we will continue to press him to open these hearings until he provides a better explanation."
I'm not an attorney, so I can't comment on whether Hoyt's rhetoric of embarrassment and humiliation is commonplace or appropriate. But to a legal outsider, it sounds overly secretive, disingenuous, and just plain weird.
Tuesday, August 26, 2003
Hoovering the country. Herbert is everywhere, first at Al Franken's appearance on CNN's Crossfire
FRANKEN: Listen, he's going to be the first president since Hoover not to add any new jobs in his first term.

CARLSON: I know. I'm sorry. We're totally, completely out of time. I'm getting it in my ear. They're saying they're going to cut us off.
Notice the timing of Tucker Carlson's not-so-smooth segue to commercial break.

Then in Slate is "The Best of George W. Bush: hooverville
Hooverville in New York
The bravest thing he ever did," by William Saletan and Ben Jacobs:
As to keeping Americans constantly informed, Bush held only nine press conferences in the first two and half years of his presidency, the lowest rate since Herbert Hoover.
Similar Hoover lines are popping up in the speeches of Dean and Kerry. None of this is new, it's just nice to see such comparisons trotted out in a coordinated fashion to gain critical mass in the public imagination.

The coordination of the Hoover references, of course, doesn't make them any less true.
Clear Channel: The Bootleg Sessions. Clear Channel is generating new sources of revenue for music acts — by creating instant, quasi-legal* CD-R recordings of live concerts that you can buy on your way out of the venue. The entire concert an audience has just witnessed, including the stage banter between songs, is preserved as a souvenir for each night's fans.

Because they create new cash streams for artists, Clear Channel is simultaneously devising new ways to control dissent (
Pitchfork Media):
Given that it's rock and roll, there's also a risk that an artist-- in a Replacements-like case of career suicide-- could record comments against Clear Channel or one of its properties. [Clear Channel Executive Vice-President Steve] Simon [the project director for the Instant Live program], allows that "there are all sorts of conceivable ways that one might deal with that," but he didn't consider it likely: "If an artist goes through the paces of doing this with us, they're doing it because they want to sell discs. They're doing it because we have a relationship with them, or have created a relationship... By the time you've been through all that I don't think there's much of a concern that the band's going to then get up there and call you names."
You hear that, rock and roll rebels? No name-calling. Clear Channel said so. If you want concert promotion, nationwide airplay, or Instant Live souvenir bootlegs, get on your knees and kiss the hem of your relationship with Clear Channel.

*The thorny issue of compensation for cover songs — songs written by someone other than the artists performing them — is sidestepped by Clear Channel according to this report.
Monday, August 25, 2003
Four moms, two towers,
one enormous pattern of lies.

The itch of incompetence. So who should be the new Secretary of the Navy? How about an executive vice president of General Dynamics? Check.

Need to nominate a director to the board of the United States Institute of Peace? How does an anti-Muslim racial profiler sound?
President Bush will nominate Deputy Homeland Security Secretary Gordon England to be Secretary of the Navy, the White House said on Friday.

The White House also said in a statement that Bush had signed the recess appointment of Daniel Pipes to the board of directors of the United States Institute of Peace, a controversial decision because Pipes has been accused of being anti-Muslim.

England, who has served previously as Navy secretary, replaces Bush's previous Navy nominee, oil executive Colin McMillan, who committed suicide in July.

He is a former executive vice president of General Dynamics Corporation.

Pipe's pending appointment has generated controversy because some Muslim-Americans and Democrats in Congress accuse him of defending racial and religious profiling.

Pipes has also suggested that mosques in America should be targets of police surveillance.
Once again, the least beneficial and most inflammatory choices are brought to you by Preparation W.

Link via Seeing the Forest.
Friday, August 22, 2003
"Sargeant, hand over half your money." If you know anything about mutual funds, you may be familiar with the load, or sales charge, that you must pay for investing in the fund.
Two to eight-and-a-half percent is a range of fairly common initial "front-end" loads. But military personnel are being slapped with loads of fifty percent on their savings for retirement (This article from Kiplinger's Personal Finance Magazine is in its paid archive. It appears in the September 2003 issue under the title "All Loaded Up."):
Our armed forces are being shot at and ambushed in Iraq, and may soon be quelling genocidal warfare in Liberia. The last thing they need is to be sold overpriced investments by the financial-services industry back home. Just ask Air Force Sgt. Michael Proulx. He attended a First Command financial-planning seminar two years ago near Ramstein Air Base in Germany. After a steak-and-schnitzel buffet, the 35-year-old noncom signed up to invest $166 monthly in a Roth IRA with Templeton Capital Accumulator fund. The first year's sales charge: 50%.

Little-known outside the military, First Command sells a class of mutual funds that levy huge upfront commissions. Some in the military are susceptible to First Command's pitch, says Richard Ferri, a money manager and retired marine major, because they have "zero experience" with funds. "What they're doing is totally legal," says Ferri. "Is it ethical? No." Replies Ivy McLemore of AIM Investments, whose products are sold by First Command: "It's a highly principled product."
These "highly principled products" are foisted upon inexperienced soldiers who have already been tricked into believing they are defending something other than the ability of their leaders to steal not only their lives but also their pittance of a salary from them.

Think about it: First Command keeps $83 out of Sgt. Michael Proulx's $166 monthly savings for the first year. He thinks he socking away money for his retirement, but half of it is eaten up in commissions.

Fifty percent of Proulx's retirement savings — after taxes, because it's a Roth IRA — is simply too much to skim off the top. Proulx already paid all the taxes on the half of his money that First Command confiscated as a sales charge. The government gets, then First Command gets, and if there's anything left in thirty years, maybe Proulx gets to retire. But that's a very big if.

First Command's practices are well beyond the expected boundaries of the inclination of businesses to invoke the letter of the law above the common sense ethical demands of the situation. These are our soldiers they are bilking. The words "unfair," "severely tilted playing field," and "lying, scheming scoundrels" come to mind.

When the soldiers in Iraq need his advocacy, where is that guy who put on a flight suit and "flew" onto an aircraft carrier not so long ago?

It's August, so he's off vacationing and fundraising.

Meanwhile, the privatization of retirement saving, a cherished conservative goal, is once again deployed to screw the little guy. This situation is an echo of the Enron scenario, in which employees' 401(k) accounts were drained while, two years later, the corporate vampire and former CEO Ken Lay is still flying first class and undoubtedly devising new politico-commercial strategies to suck the money out of his next victims.

The word "unfair," though, turns out to be a word that has fallen from the president's lips in specific circumstances. Unfortunately, his sense of moral priority is completely upside down.

Unscrupulous crony capitalism is so much worse than the "unfair" taxation of dividends, wouldn't you agree?
Thursday, August 21, 2003
Which unqualified movie or porn star should we select to occupy the Oval Office after the
Bush recall?

Link via skippy.
Demolition: that's just what Republicans do. They break and destroy things — with glee (
Houston Chronicle):
Harris County [Texas] GOP Chairman Jared Woodfill is asking local Republicans to bring sledgehammers and other implements of destruction to help level the [former headquarter] building the Democrats vacated three months ago.

"You bring the muscle, we'll bring the refreshments and we will have a party as we tear down the Harris County Democratic Party headquarters," Woodfill said in his invitation to party faithful.

Harris County Democratic Party Chairman Gerry Birnberg was quick with a metaphor. That's what Republicans do, he said, "tearing things down, destroying them."

"They did it to our economy, to our jobs market, to our voting rights, to our democracy, to civility in government, to civil rights, to health care for children, to fair pay for teachers -- they took out their sledgehammers and smashed them to smithereens."
True to their lying, thieving nature, Texas Repubs are trying to characterize the Democratic move as an "eviction," even sending a press release to that effect, when in fact the party simply moved its headquarters when its lease expired.

The Dems and local organized labor "will hold a 'peaceful' sidewalk party nearby to watch the GOP 'destroy the building and the economy.'"
Wednesday, August 20, 2003
Supine media discovers sassy oracle. Bill Clinton is the talk of Aspen Institute conference, if you ask
Michael Wolff:
The psychic heart of the conference was Bill Clinton.

He was interviewed on the second day by [Walter] Isaacson, who began by telling a story about how when he was a Rhodes scholar he’d done a paper that his Oxford professor had said was not at all in the same league as a similar paper written by a certain Rhodes scholar from Arkansas a few years before. This was one of those overachievement-upon-overachievement stories that was bound to subdue anyone.

Clinton had lost weight and—with a great collection of just-out-of-the-wrapper pastel-colored polo shirts on view throughout the conference—seemed in fabulous form. He was in campaign mode but without the restraints of campaign mode. While there was clear bitterness on his part toward the successor who had rushed “to undo everything I’d done,” and the Republicans who “will run over you unless you beat their brains out,” there was a feisty humor too. Of the disputed Harken oil deal, Clinton said Bush had “sold the stock to buy the baseball team which got him the governorship which got him the presidency.”

Clinton kept referring to the media as (contrary to Kinsley’s view) the “supine” media, pointing out that when Bush insulted Helen Thomas (who, by asking a rough question in the infamous prewar press conference had, Clinton said, “committed the sin of journalism”), no “young journalists” stood up and walked out.

The media, the supine media, was going to have to “go to the meat locker and take out its brains and critical skills.”

Everybody seemed to love this. Clinton was not just the beloved former president, but he had become some sort of sassy oracle.

There was a party on the second day for Clinton at the Aspen version of Nobu, and then, later that evening, a discussion between Clinton and President Kagame, hosted by the William Morris Agency, at Whiskey Rocks Bar in the St. Regis Hotel (Michael Eisner, the Disney CEO, while not a conference attendee, slipped into the room).

This turned out to be the pivotal moment of the conference—even the primal one. When Clinton took questions, a young man from a technology company who identified himself as chairman of Bush-Cheney 2004 in California said he was offended by Clinton’s partisanship. To which Clinton, without hesitation, and with some kind of predatory gleam in his eye, said, “Good!” From there, Clinton went on, with emotion and anger, at a level seemingly foreign to most everyone here, to rip to shreds the motives, values, and legitimacy of the Republicans.

It was all anyone could talk about the next day. People seemed genuinely taken aback (some people kept offering that since it was late at night, in a bar, it didn’t quite count) that one of their own might have violated the accepted codes of lofty liberal behavior. There was a little current of fear at the sudden recognition that testosterone could fuel politics. It was a shock, apparently, that we might be this close to real feelings. That politics could actually be personal.
Link via Altercation.
Tuesday, August 19, 2003
layFly the friendly skies of Enron. A frequent reader of this site emails to inform us that he or she spotted former Enron CEO Ken Lay on a Continental flight from Houston to Denver last Wednesday, August 13. Lay was likely flying to check on his extensive real estate holdings in Colorado, purchased with wealth purloined in the time preceding the collapse of his company and the obliteration of his employees' retirement savings.

As one of the most damaging and yet well-connected CEO criminals of our time, he was, of course, a passenger in First Class.

Some personal details: He read at least three newspapers, including the New York Times, the Financial Times, and the Houston Chronicle. He was seen tearing out an editorial from the New York Times, probably
this one, which is about to go into the paid archive:
A Get-Along Voice at the E.P.A.

Gov. Michael Leavitt's nomination to succeed Christie Whitman as administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency means that the country will be not be treated to a rerun of the political soap operas that marked the Whitman years. That is bad news. Mrs. Whitman almost always lost her internal battles on behalf of the regulatory framework that for 30 years has brought the nation cleaner air and water. But the country was better off for having her in Washington, a solitary if increasingly faint voice against the ideologues and lobbyists who occupy every other important environmental job. Mr. Leavitt, by contrast, is at one with the administration: a Westerner, unlike Mrs. Whitman, and an antiregulatory one at that. He should fit right in.

A three-term Utah governor who saw little point in seeking a fourth, Mr. Leavitt is also smart, soft-spoken and a formidable negotiator. Among his recent successes were the two back-room deals he worked out earlier this year with Gale Norton, the interior secretary, to strip federal protections from millions of acres of public land in Utah. The deals were deplored by environmentalists but celebrated by the oil, gas and off-road-vehicle interests, which hope to exploit that land for commercial purposes.

Mr. Leavitt says he is more sympathetic to the environment than his critics think. He will have some early opportunities to prove it.

On his desk are two pro-business proposals pushed by the White House that are vigorously opposed by the environmental community. One would greatly narrow the scope of the Clean Water Act by removing federal protections from millions of acres of wetlands, lakes and streams. This is a terrible proposal for which even the Justice Department has little enthusiasm. But it is favored by the home builders and other interests to whom the White House feels indebted.

The second proposal would gut a key provision of the Clean Air Act known as "new source review." That provision requires older power plants to install modern pollution controls whenever they significantly expand their output. Eliot Spitzer of New York and other attorneys general have successfully invoked the provision in a series of lawsuits against older power plants whose largely unregulated emissions contribute significantly to air pollution in the Northeast. Their most important victory came just last week in a federal case involving Ohio Edison. Since the decision is likely to influence other pending cases, the big utilities are sure to bring heavy pressure to bear on Mr. Leavitt to get rid of new-source review once and for all.

Mr. Bush plainly hopes that Mr. Leavitt's low-key approach will generally keep the E.P.A. and environmental issues out of the news. With crucial sections of two bedrock environmental laws under attack, that will not be easy.
It's frightening to know that he's still keeping up with all the latest trends in deception and deregulation, prepping himself for some kind of phoenix-like return to fraudulent corporate commerce or a return to his role as the antichrist of energy policy in the future.

While the circus of indictments of just about everyone else at Enron also deserving of prosecutorial attention continues, Ken Lay isn't suffering at all. Fat in his wide leather seat, it appears that he is on the Atkins diet because he ate only the meat from his First Class meal.
The Terminator gets Layed. The Enron-Schwarzenegger linkage is
coming to light:
In May of 2001, [Ken] Lay [CEO of Enron] convened a private meeting with junk bond king Michael Milken, Los Angeles' then-Mayor Richard Riordan and Arnold Schwarzenegger, at which Lay reportedly presented his vision of solving the state's energy deregulation crisis by, absurd as it sounds, expanding deregulation. The meeting, about which the public still knows very little, may become a major issue now that Schwarzenegger is no longer just a Republican movie star..."
Here's a more thorough and analytical report on the same meeting:
The 90-minute secret meeting Lay convened took place inside a conference room at the Peninsula Hotel. Lay, and other Enron representatives at the meeting, handed out a four-page document to Schwarzenegger, Riordan and Milken titled "Comprehensive Solution for California," which called for an end to federal and state investigations into Enron's role in the California energy crisis and said consumers should pay for the state's disastrous experiment with deregulation through multibillion rate increases. Another bullet point in the four-page document said "Get deregulation right this time -- California needs a real electricity market, not government takeovers."

The irony of that statement is that California's flawed power market design helped Enron earn more than $500 million in one year, a tenfold increase in profits from a previous year and it's coordinated effort in manipulating the price of electricity in California, which other power companies mimicked, cost the state close to $70 billion and led to the beginning of what is now the state's $38 billion budget deficit. The power crisis forced dozens of businesses to close down or move to other states, where cheaper electricity was in abundant supply, and greatly reduced the revenue California relied heavily upon.
Milken, Lay, the recently departed Poindexter — all these white collar criminals are continually prancing around the periphery, acting as lieutenants of the Bush Wimp Mafia. And Arnold's brand name and limitless ambition will enable him to sell his soul to these devils more quickly than the other hundred-odd gubernatorial candidates.
Monday, August 18, 2003
Lessons in how to lie, by
Brian Eno.

Link via Media Whores Online.

Greatest Hits · Alternatives to First Command Financial Planning · First Command, last resort, Part 3 · Part 2 · Part 1 · Stealing $50K from a widow: Wells Real Estate · Leo Wells, REITs and divine wealth · Sex-crazed Red State teenagers · What I hate: a manifesto · Spawn of Darleen Druyun · All-American high school sex party · Why is Ken Lay smiling? · Poppy's Enron birthday party · The Saudi money laundry and the president's uncle · The sentence of Enron's John Forney · The holiness of Neil Bush's marriage · The Silence of Cheney: a poem · South Park Christians · Capitalist against Bush: Warren Buffett · Fastow childen vs. Enron children · Give your prescription money to your old boss · Neil Bush, hard-working matchmaker · Republicans against fetuses and pregnant women · Emboldened Ken Lay · Faith-based jails · Please die for me so I can skip your funeral · A brief illustrated history of the Republican Party · Nancy Victory · Soldiers become accountants · Beware the Merrill Lynch mob · Darleen Druyun's $5.7 billion surprise · First responder funding · Hoovering the country · First Command fifty percent load · Ken Lay and the Atkins diet · Halliburton WMD · Leave no CEO behind · August in Crawford · Elaine Pagels · Profitable slave labor at Halliburton · Tom Hanks + Mujahideen · Sharon & Neilsie Bush · One weekend a month, or eternity · Is the US pumping Iraqi oil to Kuwait? · Cheney's war · Seth Glickenhaus: Capitalist against Bush · Martha's blow job · Mark Belnick: Tyco Catholic nut · Cheney's deferred Halliburton compensation · Jeb sucks sugar cane · Poindexter & LifeLog · American Family Association panic · Riley Bechtel and the crony economy · The Book of Sharon (Bush) · The Art of Enron · Plunder convention · Waiting in Kuwait: Jay Garner · What's an Army private worth? · Barbara Bodine, Queen of Baghdad · Sneaky bastards at Halliburton · Golf course and barbecue military strategy · Enron at large · Recent astroturf · Cracker Chic 2 · No business like war business · Big Brother · Martha Stewart vs. Thomas White · Roger Kimball, disappointed Republican poetry fan · Cheney, Lay, Afghanistan · Terry Lynn Barton, crimes of burning · Feasting at the Cheney trough · Who would Jesus indict? · Return of the Carlyle Group · Duct tape is for little people · GOP and bad medicine · Sears Tower vs Mt Rushmore · Scared Christians · Crooked playing field · John O'Neill: The man who knew · Back to the top

. . .